Alaska/Pacific Coast

Seafood Industry Asks to Cooperate with AK on Fish Tax Increase at Hearing; Current Effort Flawed
SEAFOODNEWS.COM by Peggy Parker – February 19, 2016
The House Special Committee on Fisheries heard from several members of Alaska’s seafood industry yesterday, all opposing HB251 “Electronic Tax Returns and Fisheries Taxes”, in its current form.

Shore-based operations that currently pay a 3 percent rate would go to 4 percent; salmon canneries business tax would increase from 4.5 percent to 5.5 percent, and floaters would go from 5 percent to 6 percent.  This is not a “1%” tax increase, as put out by the Governor, but a 20-33% increase for many processors.

“The approach here is oversimplified,” explained Vince O’Shea of the Pacific Seafood Processors Association who represent most processors in Alaska. “It’s not a one percent tax increase, it’s a 33 percent increase to the vast majority of the fish landed in Alaska.

“It raises the tariff on canned salmon at a time when we’re having significant challenges already on that product in the market, from forces beyond our control.

“There’s literally a perfect storm in the seafood industry, and it’s been building in the last three years,” O’Shea testified.

“This year we’re working with a 26 percent increase in minimum wage. There has been a 20-30 percent increase in currency due to strengthening of the dollar. Our buyers in Japan, China, and the European Union need to keep shelf prices stable in their stores, which means we get paid 67 cents on today’s dollar compared to a few years ago,” he said.

“I appreciate the two hearings you’ve already held on this bill. The reason you haven’t heard much from us, we’re in a learning mode. We’d like to work together with you to find new revenue from the fisheries industry. The challenge is to do it in a way that does not harm to our industry, one that relies on a renewable resource and will continue to be an important part of a robust Alaskan economy in the future,” O’Shea concluded.

Bob Thorstenson, executive director the Southeast Alaska Seiners Association, registered strong opposition. “My involvement in raw fish tax comes from both the fisherman and processor perspective. The last time a major overhaul of the fish tax was done was 1982. There hasn’t been an ISES [Institute of Social and Economic Research] look at the raw fish tax or fisheries taxes as a whole,” he said. “I don’t know anyone who’s been contacted on the economic consequences of this.”

Thorstenson told the panel that the Bering Sea crabbers currently pay for “100 percent of the cost of management of that fishery,” referring to the argument for raising taxes is to offset management costs for the fisheries. “So do we have to pay twice?”

If the statute is to be changed, Thorstenson advised the panel to look at “the communities around the state that are lined up next to vast fishing grounds but don’t get a single penny from that resource. Any future taxes have to recognize where the fish are being caught, not only where they are delivered.”  Under current tax law, fifty percent of the landing taxes go back to the borough or city where the fish were landed.

Under HB251 as written, none of the increased taxes would be shared with communities, but go into the state’s general fund exclusively.

In addition to the oral testimony, the panel received several written responses from the industry.

Joe Plescha from Trident Seafoods agreed with others when he wrote, “We understand the need to increase revenues and sincerely want to help in that process.

“But the Governor’s proposed increase on the seafood industry will result in an additional twenty-five to thirty percent increase in the seafood industry’s State tax burden. That increase is extremely large for an industry that is in the middle of difficult economic times.

“I humbly request you provide the seafood industry more time to consider the effects of the Governor’s proposed tax increase that would occur on the heels of (1) increased labor cost because of higher minimum wage rates; (2) large increases health care costs; and, (3) significant declines in wholesale prices in global salmon and whitefish markets.”

Seward-based vessel owner and direct marketer Rhonda Hubbard of Kruzof Fisheries, has been at each hearing held on the bill.

“We really do need more time on this,” she said. “The fisheries tax is really complicated, probably one of the most complicated taxes in the Department of Revenue.”

She was the only one who commented on the section of the bill requiring electronic reporting. “Electronic reporting will make things more efficient. There could be inconsistencies in between data from ADF&G and Department of Revenues, and that should be looked at.

“Another idea is why aren’t charters getting taxed? With more time and analyses on these issues, we can come up with something that will get the revenue up and be a lot more equitable,” Hubbard said.

Bob Kruger, executive director of the Alaska Whitefish Trawlers Association pointed out that an increase of taxes for both fishermen and processors will hurt new entrants to the fishery. “Additional tax burdens would be a disincentive for young people to get involved in the fishery. We know it’s inevitable that we’ll be burdened with additional tax debt, and we’ll deal with it. We just hope it’s equitable and reasonable.”

A fourth hearing on the bill will be held next Tuesday, February 23, 2016.
http://www.seafoodnews.com/Story/1009244/Seafood-Industry-Asks-to-Cooperate-with-AK-on-Fish-Tax-Increase-at-Hearing-Current-Effort-Flawed

Fishermen, processors respond to fish tax proposal
KDLG by Molly Dischner – February 19, 2016
Despite acknowledging the need for more revenue, fisheries stakeholders raised lots of questions about the governor’s plan to increase state fisheries taxes this week.
http://kdlg.org/post/fishermen-processors-respond-fish-tax-proposal

The Alaska Fisheries Report
KMXT – February 18, 2016
Coming up this week, Norton Sound’s crab fishery opened Monday after a delay due to sea ice, the Department of Fish and Game will take over many of the services that once belonged to the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission, and Kodiak government is split over a contract with its fisheries analyst. We had help from KNOM’s Laura Kraegel in Nome, KTOO’s Lisa Phu in Juneau, and Fish Radio’s Laine Welch in Kodiak.
http://www.kmxt.org/content/view/7066/2/

New restrictions made on king salmon fishing in Kenai and Kasilof
KDLL by Jenny Neyman – February 19, 2016
The Alaska Department of Fish and Game announced restrictions Thursday for king salmon fishing in the Kenai and Kasilof Rivers in order to try and meet escapement goals.
http://www.alaskapublic.org/2016/02/19/new-restrictions-made-on-king-salmon-fishing-in-kenai-and-kasilof/

National

Hidden corporate donors poured $11M into fight to stop GMO labels in Wash.
Seattle Times by Jim Brunner – February 18, 2016
A food-industry group tried to shield identities of major corporations that spent $11 million to defeat a 2013 food-labeling initiative in what Attorney General Bob Ferguson argues is among the worst cases of concealment in state history.
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/hidden-donors-poured-11m-into-fight-over-genetically-modified-food-labeling/

Environment/Science

How different are hatchery fish from wild ones? The DNA results surprised scientists
Alaska Dispatch News by Yereth Rosen – February 19, 2016
Hatchery-raised fish became genetically distinct from their wild counterparts in a single generation, a new study of Oregon steelhead trout found.
http://www.adn.com/article/20160219/how-different-are-hatchery-fish-wild-ones-dna-results-surprised-scientists

Scientists Establish Baseline to Gauge How Alaska Communities Will Respond to Change

AFSC News – February 18, 2016
In a new study by NOAA Fisheries, scientists looked at 347 Alaska communities to assess their dependence on marine resources and socio-economic well-being.  This is the first time that NOAA Fisheries has used “quantitative” indicators for this type of assessment in Alaska. Scientists hope to provide marine resource managers with a scientifically sound rapid assessment of community resiliency over time.
http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/news/Alaska_communities_response_to_change.htm?utm_source=AK%20Community%20Baseline&utm_campaign=Alaska%20Community%20Baseline&utm_medium=email

How to salvage a huge tugboat without spilling 9,500 gallons of fuel and oil
KTOO by Matt Miller –  February 18, 2016
Imagine a small, but very busy high school science fair, and you’ll have a pretty good idea of what it was like at the Coast Guard’s open house on Tuesday to explain the imminent salvage of the wrecked tug Challenger. The neglected 96-foot World War II era vessel sank last September in Gastineau Channel just across from the Juneau Yacht Club.
http://www.ktoo.org/2016/02/18/how-to-salvage-a-huge-tugboat-without-spilling-9500-gallons-of-fuel-and-oil/

FYI’s

Baby food entry is Symphony’s grand prize winner
Canned smoked herring smoked coho salmon caviar anti-aging serum also among winning entries in 2016 competition
Cordova Times by Margaret Bauman – February 20, 2016
Halibut baby food developed by an Anchorage mom bent on creating a delicious and nutritious food for infants took top honors Feb. 19 at the 23rd annual Alaska Symphony of Seafood gala in Anchorage.
http://www.thecordovatimes.com/article/1607baby-food-entry-is-symphonys-grand-prize

Ann Owens
Pacific Seafood Processors Association
Office Manager
1900 W Emerson Place Suite 205, Seattle, WA 98119
Phone: 206.281.1667
E-mail: pspafish@gmail.com; Website: www.pspafish.net
Our office days/hours are Monday-Friday
8:00 A.M. – 5:00 P.M.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. *Inclusion of a news article, report, or other document in this email does not imply PSPA support or endorsement of the information or opinion expressed in the document.

February 22, 2016